Based on a score of 35/50 on a confrontation object-naming ability test, what conclusion can be drawn about Ms. Helene's disorder?

Based on a score of 35/50 on a confrontation object-naming ability test, what conclusion can be drawn about Ms. Helene's disorder?

• A. She has anomic aphasia, which might or might not be associated with other language deficits.
• B. She has aphasia, but the type cannot be specified based on this test score alone.
• C. She does not have aphasia but probably does have a memory disturbance.
• D. She has difficulty with naming, but the precise nature of the deficit cannot be determined based on this test score.

Answer: (D)

The conclusion drawn that Ms. Helene has difficulty with naming, but the precise nature of the deficit cannot be determined based on this test score, is supported by the performance level indicated in the confrontation object-naming ability test. Scoring 35 out of 50 suggests a significant challenge with naming, which can be indicative of various conditions related to language processing, such as aphasia or other cognitive-linguistic disorders. However, a specific score does not provide enough information to classify the type of naming difficulty (e.g., anomic aphasia, which focuses on word retrieval issues, or possibly other forms of aphasia that affect different aspects of language). As a result, while it is evident that there is a naming difficulty, such as those seen in anomic aphasia, the test score alone does not offer sufficient details regarding associated deficits or the overall classification of Ms. Helene's condition. To accurately characterize her disorder and understand the exact nature of her language impairment, further assessment would be necessary, potentially involving a broader evaluation of language skills and cognitive functions.

The conclusion drawn that Ms. Helene has difficulty with naming, but the precise nature of the deficit cannot be determined based on this test score, is supported by the performance level indicated in the confrontation object-naming ability test. Scoring 35 out of 50 suggests a significant challenge with naming, which can be indicative of various conditions related to language processing, such as aphasia or other cognitive-linguistic disorders. However, a specific score does not provide enough information to classify the type of naming difficulty (e.g., anomic aphasia, which focuses on word retrieval issues, or possibly other forms of aphasia that affect different aspects of language).

As a result, while it is evident that there is a naming difficulty, such as those seen in anomic aphasia, the test score alone does not offer sufficient details regarding associated deficits or the overall classification of Ms. Helene's condition. To accurately characterize her disorder and understand the exact nature of her language impairment, further assessment would be necessary, potentially involving a broader evaluation of language skills and cognitive functions.